Welcome to Wikifrauds                            

Tim Reiter and Mortgage Capital Partners, Melbourne

Information provided to Wikifrauds shows Tim Reiter to be a supposed finance broker who has taken an upfront fee of $50,000 to broker a funding deal which has never eventuated, and Reiter refuses to repay the client. We also believe that there may be a second such deal in 'process' which may also be in the same situation, but one in which this second party has paid substantially more money.
Details of the first deal are now revealed. We have 'sanitised' the documents to remove the applicant's names, and in the email below, we have altered the name of the introducer to "George X". Otherwise, the following documents are real and valid copies of the originals we have on hand.
Reiter's associates: Melburnians Richard White and Charles Cameron, and a Paul Robinson, England?

1. First Fraud:  (See also second fraud)                  Reiter loses in WA Court. Judge slams his credibility. Read court findings, in particular clauses 186 -191.

ˇ         "We were introduced to Tim Reiter through a local broker, George X.

ˇ         We were advised that Tim had access to foreign funds for property development and investment. Given our past experience with overseas loan offers we were wary, but had more confidence this time as we were dealing with an Australian company and all fee payments etc would go through that entity, so we felt we had some recourse if things did not turn out as expected. We had also dealt with Tim on another loan application several years ago, so we knew he had been operating in the Australian property finance sector for quite some time.

ˇ         We completed the application form and  George submitted them for us. We were advised our application was approved and we needed to fly to Melbourne to meet Tim so that the loan could be advanced. We did so on 2nd December, 2013. The funds were to be provided by a collection of high net worth people, and come via of Spain because there were less regulations on international lending from there. Tim advised that’s several loan applications were well advanced and would settle within the next two weeks.

ˇ         We were provided with a one page pre-contractual loan approval form (attached) and advised that to advance the loan, a $50,000 fee was required. We would then receive the full loan document, and then proceed to a property valuation which we would need to fund.

ˇ         We signed the approval form and paid the $50,000 which was invoiced by Mortgage Capital Partners Pty Ltd. We were then advised us that the fund, Private International Finance, was managed by Paul Robinson, an English lawyer. We couldn’t find either on the internet.

ˇ         The loan documentation that arrived a week later was insubstantial (copy attached) particularly considering the quantum of the loan, there was a short time frame to accept it. The loan document didn’t even identify the lender and there was nowhere for the lender to sign.

ˇ         The valuation fee was quoted at just under $80,000, well above what we would expect to pay for a valuation . We asked to see the valuers fee proposal but this was denied.

ˇ         We exchanged several emails in the week following (all attached) seeking clarification and further information to fill in the gaps in the loan document. They were answered either by Tim Reiter or the lender, Paul Robinson. Their responses basically added up to “sign the loan offer and pay the valuation fee or lose your $50,000”.

ˇ         We requested a refund on our fee from Mortgage Capital Partners as they had invoiced us, but they had not carried through on their promises.

ˇ         No refund has been forthcoming.

Any advice or assistance you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards .... (Name withheld)"


The above email speaks for itself. There is no evidence of any real lender. No proper company name or company registration to enable the client to undertake any due diligence on the alleged lender. And at the foot of the alleged loan document are the contact details for this Paul Robinson character - the funder. How come it's a gmail address (untraceable) instead of a legitimate company email address ????

Yet because of the more than reasonable request to call it a day and ask for a refund, Reiter relies on the some other document to withhold the client's money. NOT GOOD ENOUGH MR REITER!

Loan Documentation:

2. Below is an image of the "Terms Sheet" issued by Reiter.

Q: Whoever heard of a 30 year construction loan of  $25 million (plus brokerage) at 3.75% fixed interest, and with a no-cost, no repayment term of the first five years. Sound too good to be true? Click here to see the entire loan documentation. We have a number of further emails on this matter and will release them in due course.

Update dec 2017:
2. Second Fraud (This all occurred in the months leading up to November 2017)
This one didn't eventuate as the would be victim undertook more due diligence and smelled the rat just in time. This is his story:

Our business was pursuing project finance for power generation projects in overseas. This required project finance of USD$21 Million and a funder with an appetite for country risk such as Xxxx. To the experienced, this is quite normal business.

Because this was our first project in Xxxxx and I found on the internet Mortgage Capital Group, Melbourne, who specialised in large international project finance, especially for higher risk projects/regions.

On email enquiry through their website I was phoned by a Richard White and asked to a meeting one Saturday morning in their Melbourne office. The quiet of a Saturday morning suited perfectly. The meeting went well, I was in their plush offices in Melbourne CBD they felt legit and very capable. The meeting was with MCG representatives Richard White and Charles Cameron.
I was advised that most of their project funding came from wealthy individuals/funds in Spain and Dubai and that our project was their core business. At a glance they would likely be able to help as we discussed the application and due diligence processes required and the time frames.

Quickly I went away and compiled a formal bound project finance application based on all the usual information I expected a financier to ask for. This was emailed to Charles Cameron / Mortgage Capital Group. Several weeks passed and nothing meaningful was heard from MCG despite my emailing several times and phoning. At best all I received was a generic MCG email, and I dId not know who sent it, “application received” or “being processed”.
After a couple more weeks with nothing I called back into the offices of Mortgage Capital Group without appointment. First red flag was when I asked the lady at the front desk to see the manager of Mortgage Capital Group and she replied “who?”. I went back outside and phoned both Richard White and Charles Cameron to no avail. 
Soon after Charles Cameron phoned me back and agrees to meet me at the office, so I turned up at the agreed time and was immediately greeted by Charles Cameron standing in the lift foyer who immediately ushered me straight down to a café across the road. I did not get anywhere near their office.

At the café I asked about our application to which Charles confirmed all was in hand, progressing well and he confirmed “I see no reason for this not to proceed” so again we then ran through the application process and MCG application costs involved and how MCG earn their fees. Nothing was ever mentioned about any upfront MCG application fee require to be paid.
Again I had ratified to me that our project funding was most likely to come from either Spain or Dubai. He did confirm the only thing missing to support our application was that I needed to forward copies of all our directors passport IDs and proof of address which I did as part of ‘know your client compliance’ which is quite normal.

Again several weeks passed and nothing was received from MCG, being mindful our project had its own deadlines to meet and now things were heading down to the wire. Again I phoned both Charles Cameron and Richard White and left messages that things are getting down to the wire, so MCG needed to either forward a finance term sheet offer or just tell us they cannot do the deal and we will cancel our commitment to the project. They never returned the calls and I never heard from either Charles or Richard again. 

About a week later I received a call out of the blue from a Tim Reiter whom I had never heard the name mentioned before, “hello, I am the owner of Mortgage Capital Group, I have your finance term sheet offer, you had better come into our office so we can discuss it”…….so I turn up the following day to the MCG office. Same routine – I step out of the lift and I am immediately greeted by Tim Reiter who ushers me straight back down to the same café across the road - we never went into the office.

Very quickly Tim Reiter gets down to “before I give you your finance offer, I require you to just settle the application fee” ……..I was provided just an instruction, no invoice, to pay $69,000 to another finance company name that I had never heard mentioned prior, not Mortgage Capital Group. I promptly asked Tim why after all this time I was I never made aware of this requirement prior and the argument quickly became heated. “I am a very reasonable and upfront person”
I finally told Tim Reiter that I would agree to pay the application fee but I at least needed to see the finance offer first in lieu of all the stuffing around and vagueness that this MCG application has taken.

The next day the finance offer was sent to my email. The document was at best a laughing stock.
1. The offer was not actually an offer that Tim Reiter assured me was ready. Instead it was an agreement that if we paid the $69,000 our application would be looked at – still with no assurance of approval.
2. It was from a Brisbane finance company whom had never been mentioned prior and on checking their website appeared to specialise in consumer finance and used cars. Certainly there was no mention of the wealthy Spanish or Dubai funds mentioned prior. It was the farthest away from what I was expecting.
3. Most concerning was that clearly whoever drafted the term sheet had no experience whatsoever in international project finance. Amateurish and unsophisticated best described the offer. Even finance documentation for hire purchasing a TV is more sophisticated, our requirement was for a USD$21M project in Xxxxxx.
4. Time Reiter’s total focus quickly became the payment of the $69,000 application fee, unless this was paid no further questions would be answered as I had wasted enough of MCG time already.

The total experience with Mortgage Capital Group and those involved became so suspicious and sour on receiving the finance “offer” and the demand for the fee payment that it prompted me to immediately go from the meeting to searching online for their association with any scams, hence my story ended up here. 

 Connecting all the dots I have no doubt Tim Reiter and MCG is very likely a scam:
1. Mortgage Capital Group probably did not even occupy the office that I visited. The plush offices I originally visited happened on a Saturday morning – when noone else was there. I also recall those officeshad not a single reference to MCG, not even a simple name in the foyer directory. During weekdays I made it no further than the lift lobby and the lady at the front desk tells me “who” when I arrive unannounced and I asked to see someone from MCG.
2. MCG only operated mobile phones and a generic email address and a vague MCG website, there were no business cards, no ABN, no brochures, no staff, no front desk reception, no formal communication, no formal finance application or due diligence processes.   
3. The finance offer was at best amateurish and unsophisticated, would not even comply for a used car loan, let alone a USD$21 Million project in Xxxxx.
4. There was never any questions or due diligence about the actual project itself, nobody at MCG was ever remotely concerned about:
(i) the project technical validation
(ii) how the money was going to repaid
(iii) the security
(iv) how sound our end customer was.
I don’t believe anything was actually done with our original finance application supplied to MCG.
5. Tim Reiter and the other 2 men had very vague Linked-In profiles, in conjunction with a vague website with no direct contact details. In international project finance such comprehensive information is normal. These guys were at best vague, at worst completely untraceable.
6. The registered office details within ASIC for Mortgage Capital Group pointed to yet another address and director personnel I had never heard of, despite Tim Reiter introducing himself to me as “the owner” of MCG. And the MCG Australian website is registered to a USA office.

Specifically whilst I was not directly scammed out of any money by Tim Reiter or Mortgage Capital Group, I have absolutely no doubt that on paying his finance “application fee” my money and Tim Reiter would never be seen or heard from again including Charles Cameron and Richard White. On reading the prior story on Wikifrauds relating to Tim Reiter and MCG, instantly all my dots are connected and I have absolutely no doubt that MCG is/was a sham and Tim Reiter’s sole intent was to scam our business.

Either Tim Reiter’s business is either scamming “application fees” or identity theft (through requesting passport ID’s and proof of address)……or both. Even if MCG was perfectly legit, they would be incapable of ever writing any legit project finance business. 

We have heard on the grapevine that Mr Reiter is going to sue Wikifrauds. Our informants, Mr Reiter's former client (Fraud 1 above), has stated that full support for us will be forthcoming in such an event. Meantime, potential clients ofMortgage Capital Partners and Reiter are warned not to deal with this man and his company.